William Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
-
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Papers in
-
- Ethics in medical practice 3
- Co-authors
- Dominic Sisti (2 shared papers)Paul S. Appelbaum (4 shared papers)Harris D. Riley (1 shared paper)Donald R. Mars (1 shared paper)Carolyn M. Tucker (1 shared paper)Robert C. Ziller (1 shared paper)Kimberley Brownlee (1 shared paper)Robert Audi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatric Services (4 papers)Bioethics (2 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (2 papers)JAMA (1 paper)Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William Smith
31 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 170
- Nephrology 33
- Toxicology 14
- Organic Chemistry 96
- Complementary and alternative medicine 20
Countries citing papers authored by William Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1960 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 9 | National Coalition of STD Directors | 2012 | 7 |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | The Vocation of the Scholar | 2010 | 5 |
| 16 | Experimentalist governance, deliberation and democracy : a case study of primary commodity roundtables | 2010 | 5 |
| 17 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 3 |
About William Smith
William Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (170 citations), Nephrology (33 citations), Toxicology (14 citations), Organic Chemistry (96 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (20 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dominic Sisti, Paul S. Appelbaum, Harris D. Riley, Donald R. Mars, Carolyn M. Tucker, Robert C. Ziller, Kimberley Brownlee, Robert Audi, Johann Gottlieb Fichte and James Brassett. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Bioethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, JAMA and Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.