William Smith

1.6k citations
57 papers · 951 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Smith

50 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

William Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Political Science and International Relations 430
  • Public Administration 54
  • Communication 104
  • Sociology and Political Science 550
  • Philosophy 112
Replace David Harrington Watt with:
David Harrington Watt United States
Кари Палонен Finland
Marc W. Steinberg United States
Lasse Thomassen United Kingdom
Terence Ball United States
Gregory M. Maney United States
James T. Knauer United States
Jeffrey C. Alexander United States
Geraint Parry United Kingdom
Bernhard Giesen Germany
William Smith relative to David Harrington Watt United States David Harrington Watt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
David Harrington Watt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Smith Line = papers co-authored together William Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982399
2 2003117
3 201352
4 200738
5 200836
6 201030
7 200428
8 201628
9 201223
10 201021
11 201213
12 199513
13 201011
14 200611
15 201410
16 201710
17 19768
18 19908
19 19937
20 19876

About William Smith

William Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Communication and Law, having authored 57 papers that have together received 951 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (8 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (6 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (6 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (430 citations), Public Administration (54 citations), Communication (104 citations), Sociology and Political Science (550 citations) and Philosophy (112 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Fine, James Brassett, Ben Richardson, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Helen V. Milner, J.C. Barnes, Michael Loriaux, Peter Gourevitch, Stephan Haggard and G. John Ikenberry. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Politics and Society, Ethics & International Affairs, Politics & Society, American Political Science Review and Contemporary Political Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact