William Siler

50 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

William Siler
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Artificial Intelligence 625
  • Developmental Biology 38
  • Statistics and Probability 139
  • Control and Systems Engineering 373
  • Aging 27
Replace Laura Toloşi with:
Laura Toloşi Germany
Ferdinand van der Heijden Netherlands
Hon Keung Tony Ng United States
Iain L. MacDonald South Africa
Paul Fergus United Kingdom
Yo‐Ping Huang Taiwan
Robin Genuer France
Benoît Liquet France
Fabian Scheipl Germany
Maria Kateri Germany
William Siler relative to Laura Toloşi Germany Laura Toloşi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Laura Toloşi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Siler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Siler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Siler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Siler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Siler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Siler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Siler. The network helps show where William Siler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Siler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Siler Line = papers co-authored together William Siler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990387
2 2004317
3 1979294
4 2004238
5 198697
6 198984
7 200568
8 198363
9 200152
10 199146
11 196944
12 196939
13 199034
14 200733
15 197325
16 199924
17 196624
18 198719
19 196618
20 197418

About William Siler

William Siler is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, Surgery and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (15 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (9 papers), Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (5 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (4 papers), Marine animal studies overview (3 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (3 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (625 citations), Developmental Biology (38 citations), Statistics and Probability (139 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (373 citations) and Aging (27 citations). William Siler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Monaco and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include James J. Buckley, Hao Ying, Douglas M. Tucker, Philip E. Martin, Gerald D. Buckberg, Marisa Di Donato, Vincent Dor, Alfred W.H. Stanley, Constantine L. Athanasuleas and Irving L. Kron. Their work appears in journals such as Fuzzy Sets and Systems, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact