William S. Ray

502 citations
11 papers · 381 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William S. Ray

10 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

William S. Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 39
  • Insect Science 39
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 45
  • Ecology 57
  • Statistics and Probability 16
Replace C. James Scheirer with:
C. James Scheirer United States
W. G. S. Hines Canada
Wim J. van der Steen Netherlands
Erika R. Behrend United States
Manuel Koller Switzerland
Norman W. Heimstra United States
Angela C. Jones United States
Rachel Macdonald United Kingdom
William V. Mayer United States
Ronald Ranvaud Brazil
William S. Ray relative to C. James Scheirer United States C. James Scheirer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. James Scheirer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Ray. The network helps show where William S. Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside William S. Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William S. Ray Line = papers co-authored together William S. Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1976313
2 196125
3 195512
4 19578
5 19637
6 19615
7 19624
8 19583
9
The science of psychology : an introduction
19642
10 19621
11 19601

About William S. Ray

William S. Ray is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Mechanics of Materials, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (1 paper), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper), Counseling Practices and Supervision (1 paper), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (39 citations), Insect Science (39 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (45 citations), Ecology (57 citations) and Statistics and Probability (16 citations). William S. Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. James Scheirer, Nathan Hare, Martin Fox, William U. Snyder, Richard H. Lindeman, Tim Andrews, Robert L. Gibson, G. Barrie Wetherill, John D. Hundleby and George M. Guthrie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Biometrics, Psychometrika and The Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact