William Roberts

48 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

William Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Hematology 295
  • Environmental Chemistry 264
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 438
  • Soil Science 130
  • Oncology 315
Replace David Morgan with:
David Morgan United States
Ryan C. Lynch United States
Henry K. Wong United States
David Brandes United States
Jeremy M. Stark United States
Ross Brown Australia
C Kuhn United States
Jingzhi Wang China
Thomas Pabst Switzerland
Graham R. Taylor United Kingdom
William Roberts relative to David Morgan United States David Morgan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
David Morgan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Roberts. The network helps show where William Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Roberts Line = papers co-authored together William Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991311
2 1992240
3
Amplification of the gli gene in childhood sarcomas.
1989185
4 1997147
5
Detection of N-myc gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diagnostic utility for neuroblastoma.
1993135
6 2008121
7 2012121
8 199484
9 200174
10 199469
11 196965
12 199360
13 202145
14 199244
15 201735
16 201233
17 201828
18 195926
19 199125
20 199522

About William Roberts

William Roberts is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science, Water Science and Technology, Hematology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (14 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (7 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (5 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (4 papers) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (295 citations), Environmental Chemistry (264 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (438 citations), Soil Science (130 citations) and Oncology (315 citations). William Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include A. Thomas Look, Michelle Horner, William E. Evans, David K. Kalwinsky, P. M. Haygarth, Marc Stutter, Susana C. Raimondi, Peter J. Houghton, SC Peiper and EC Douglass. Their work appears in journals such as Mineralium Deposita, Human Gene Therapy, Economic Geology, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact