William Remus

2.9k citations
66 papers · 2.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

William Remus

62 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

William Remus
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • General Decision Sciences 184
  • Management Science and Operations Research 915
  • Management Information Systems 250
  • Information Systems and Management 189
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 59
Replace Marcus J. O’Connor with:
Marcus J. O’Connor Australia
Dilek Önkal United Kingdom
Derek W. Bunn United Kingdom
Steven M. Walczak United States
James F. Courtney United States
Mustafa Sinan Gonul United Kingdom
Konstantinos I. Nikolopoulos United Kingdom
Hengyun Li Hong Kong
Magne Jørgensen Norway
Monica P. Adya United States
William Remus relative to Marcus J. O’Connor Australia Marcus J. O’Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Marcus J. O’Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Remus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Remus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Remus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Remus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Remus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Remus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Remus. The network helps show where William Remus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside William Remus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Remus Line = papers co-authored together William Remus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996377
2 1994360
3 1986194
4 1999137
5 1984122
6 201494
7 199389
8 199470
9 198756
10 199654
11 199753
12 198648
13 200147
14 200444
15 199443
16 198932
17 200232
18 199630
19 199529
20 197823

About William Remus

William Remus is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences, Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forecasting Techniques and Applications (23 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers), Decision Support System Applications (12 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Management and Marketing Education (4 papers) and Academic Writing and Publishing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (184 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (915 citations), Management Information Systems (250 citations), Information Systems and Management (189 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (59 citations). William Remus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Marcus J. O’Connor, Tim Hill, Leorey Marquez, Jeffrey E Kottemann, Margaret Meiling Luo, Kenneth Griggs, Fred D. Davis, Kai H. Lim, Reginald G. Worthley and Pauline Joy Sheldon. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Forecasting, Management Science, MIS Quarterly, Journal of Forecasting and Omega.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact