William Rasch

932 citations
34 papers · 462 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Rasch

28 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

William Rasch
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Sociology and Political Science 251
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
  • Philosophy 51
  • Political Science and International Relations 83
  • Management Science and Operations Research 42
Replace David Ames Curtis with:
David Ames Curtis United States
Dirk Martin Germany
Albrecht Wellmer Germany
Wolfgang van den Daele Germany
Torbjørn L. Knutsen Norway
Chrysostomos Mantzavinos Greece
Julian Müller Germany
Antoine Bousquet United Kingdom
Gabriel Tarde France
Yaron Ezrahi Israel
William Rasch relative to David Ames Curtis United States David Ames Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
David Ames Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Rasch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Rasch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Rasch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Rasch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Rasch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Rasch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Rasch. The network helps show where William Rasch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside William Rasch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Rasch Line = papers co-authored together William Rasch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity
2002156
2 200177
3
Observing Complexity: Systems Theory and Postmodernity
200068
4 200020
5
Sovereignty and its Discontents: On the Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political
200418
6 199117
7 199412
8 199510
9 199310
10 20058
11 20128
12 20076
13 20065
14 19945
15 20055
16 20144
17 19924
18 19954
19 20133
20 20083

About William Rasch

William Rasch is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theology and Sovereignty (5 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (4 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (3 papers), German Social Sciences and History (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (3 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (251 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (42 citations). William Rasch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Niklas Luhmann, Robert C. Holub, Cary Wolfe and Armin Nassehi. Their work appears in journals such as South Atlantic Quarterly, German Studies Review, Cultural Critique, The German Quarterly and SubStance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact