William Pfister

603 citations
12 papers · 423 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Pfister

12 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

William Pfister
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Pharmaceutical Science 146
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Dermatology 45
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 61
  • Small Animals 22
Replace F. Mailland with:
F. Mailland Italy
Mark C. Heit United States
P. Thomann Switzerland
Howard Maibach United States
Steven Sims United States
Sayed Ismail Egypt
Ian F. Gibson United Kingdom
Prachi Saxena India
Serena Tongiani Italy
Luiz Eduardo Nunes Ferreira Brazil
William Pfister relative to F. Mailland Italy F. Mailland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
F. Mailland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Pfister

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Pfister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Pfister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Pfister more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Pfister

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Pfister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Pfister. The network helps show where William Pfister may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside William Pfister, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Pfister Line = papers co-authored together William Pfister links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1999166
2 197848
3 200842
4
Permeation enhancers compatible with transdermal drug delivery systems. Part I: selection and formulation considerations.
199242
5 200833
6 197823
7 197821
8 197814
9 201513
10 197710
11
Permeation enhancers compatible with transdermal drug delivery systems: part II: system design considerations.
199210
12
PHARMACOLOGICAL CONTROL OF APPETITE: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FORMAMIDINES AND OTHER AGENTS WHICH INCREASE FEEDING
19781

About William Pfister

William Pfister is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Science, Polymers and Plastics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (2 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (1 paper) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (146 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Dermatology (45 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (61 citations) and Small Animals (22 citations). William Pfister has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include G.K.W. Yim, Dean S.T. Hsieh, Robert M. Hollingworth, Mahmoud A. Ghannoum, Lisa Long, Michael P. Holsapple, David E. Nichols, Christopher P. Steidle, Michael W. Rooney and James L. Yeager. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Mycoses, Rhinology Journal, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology and The Journal of Sexual Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact