William P. Acker

566 citations
22 papers · 482 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William P. Acker

22 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

William P. Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 118
  • Biophysics 58
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 8
  • Computational Mechanics 133
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 190
Replace R.B. Williams with:
R.B. Williams United Kingdom
Christoph Klieber France
Kenshiro Takagi Japan
Yuki Endo Japan
Robert D. Corsaro United States
William A. Tolbert United States
Samuel C. Johnson United States
Kentaro Sugawara Japan
Adam B. Hopkins United States
William P. Acker relative to R.B. Williams United Kingdom R.B. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.3×
R.B. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William P. Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Acker. The network helps show where William P. Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside William P. Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William P. Acker Line = papers co-authored together William P. Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199663
2 198944
3 198841
4 199237
5 199035
6 199534
7 199333
8 199330
9 198930
10 199128
11 199222
12 199018
13 199211
14 199711
15 19959
16 19878
17 19937
18 19937
19 19936
20 19933

About William P. Acker

William P. Acker is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Biophysics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (7 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Vehicle emissions and performance (2 papers) and Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (118 citations), Biophysics (58 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (8 citations), Computational Mechanics (133 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (190 citations). William P. Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Chang, David H. Leach, James Swindal, Steven C. Hill, Gang Chen, Ali Serpengüzel, Brandon Yip, Gang Chen, William Studzinski and Thomas Litzinger. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Optics Letters, Chemical Physics Letters, Surface Science and Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact