William P. Acker

22 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

William P. Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 110
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 8
  • Biophysics 50
  • Computational Mechanics 126
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 168
Replace R.B. Williams with:
R.B. Williams United Kingdom
Christoph Klieber France
Yuki Endo Japan
Adam B. Hopkins United States
Robert D. Corsaro United States
Denis Semwogerere United States
Samuel C. Johnson United States
Jinlong Gao Sweden
Subramanian Sankaran United States
Michel Prigent France
William P. Acker relative to R.B. Williams United Kingdom R.B. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.7×
R.B. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William P. Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Acker. The network helps show where William P. Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside William P. Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William P. Acker Line = papers co-authored together William P. Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199662
2 198941
3 198837
4 199235
5 199034
6 199331
7 199530
8 199329
9 198926
10 199125
11 199219
12 199015
13 199710
14 199210
15 19959
16 19877
17 19937
18 19935
19 19935
20 19933

About William P. Acker

William P. Acker is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Biophysics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (7 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers) and Vehicle emissions and performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (110 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (8 citations), Biophysics (50 citations), Computational Mechanics (126 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (168 citations). William P. Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Chang, David H. Leach, James Swindal, Steven C. Hill, Gang Chen, Ali Serpengüzel, Brandon Yip, Gang Chen, Mitchell D. Smooke and Thomas Litzinger. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Optics Letters, Chemical Physics Letters, Applied Physics B and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact