William Moir

13 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

William Moir
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Occupational Therapy 142
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 89
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 74
  • Emergency Medical Services 15
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 33
Replace Caralee Caplan‐Shaw with:
Caralee Caplan‐Shaw United States
Sunil Pandya India
Phillip LoSavio United States
Jacob Glaser United States
Martin G. A. Baartmans Netherlands
Hongying Shi China
Charles B. Pasque United States
Ryan P. Cauley United States
Phillip W. Boaz United States
K Zimmerman United States
William Moir relative to Caralee Caplan‐Shaw United States Caralee Caplan‐Shaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Caralee Caplan‐Shaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Moir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Moir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Moir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Moir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Moir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Moir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Moir. The network helps show where William Moir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Moir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Moir Line = papers co-authored together William Moir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201555
2 201644
3 201735
4 201332
5 201632
6 201528
7 201627
8 201816
9 201611
10
What is the relationship between flow and function in diabetic cardiomyopathy? A quantitative study using contrast echo and strain rate imaging
20049
11 20158
12 20035
13 20243

About William Moir

William Moir is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (7 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (142 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (89 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (74 citations), Emergency Medical Services (15 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (33 citations). William Moir has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Mayris P. Webber, David J. Prezant, Rachel Zeig‐Owens, Charles B. Hall, Nadia Jaber, Michael D. Weiden, Kerry Kelly, Theresa Schwartz, Hillel W. Cohen and Kerry J. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, CHEST Journal, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Arthritis & Rheumatology and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact