William Min

26 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

William Min
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 46
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 4
  • Surgery 175
  • Emergency Medical Services 20
Replace Moira W. Devereaux with:
Moira W. Devereaux Canada
Jeremy K. Rush United States
Güven Bulut Türkiye
Nicola Vannet United Kingdom
W. Herbert Roerdink Netherlands
Vilijam Zdravkovic Switzerland
Geraldo da Rocha Motta Filho Brazil
Wendy E. Bruinsma United States
Sigbjørn Dimmen Norway
Donald W. Hohman United States
William Min relative to Moira W. Devereaux Canada Moira W. Devereaux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Moira W. Devereaux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Min

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Min's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Min with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Min more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Min

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Min. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Min. The network helps show where William Min may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Min, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Min Line = papers co-authored together William Min links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200594
2 201182
3 201529
4 201322
5 201117
6 201016
7 201115
8 201113
9 201513
10 201012
11
Open distal humerus fractures--review of the literature.
201011
12 201111
13 20109
14 20129
15 20138
16 20106
17 20075
18 20095
19 20053
20 20113

About William Min

William Min is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Emergency Medical Services, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone fractures and treatments (6 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (5 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (4 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers) and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (42 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (46 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (4 citations), Surgery (175 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (20 citations). William Min has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Marika Bergenstock, Nirmal C. Tejwani, Derek R. Pupello, Matthew A. Walker, ROY W. SANDERS, Mark A. Frankle, Philip J. Mulieri, Philip R. Wolinsky, Timo Stübig and Christian Krettek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Foot & Ankle International, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and International Orthopaedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact