William Mark Ford

6.5k citations
239 papers · 4.8k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

William Mark Ford

225 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

William Mark Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
  • Ecology 1.6k
  • Ecological Modeling 148
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 408
  • Global and Planetary Change 672
Replace Jorge Manuel Palmeirim with:
Jorge Manuel Palmeirim Portugal
Bradley Law Australia
Jaime A. Ramos Portugal
Marco Aurélio Pizo Brazil
Christoph F. J. Meyer United Kingdom
Daniel G. Wenny United States
Susan J. Hannon Canada
Peter Feinsinger United States
Eyal Shochat Israel
D. Matthias Dehling Germany
William Mark Ford relative to Jorge Manuel Palmeirim Portugal Jorge Manuel Palmeirim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jorge Manuel Palmeirim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Mark Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Mark Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Mark Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Mark Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Mark Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Mark Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Mark Ford. The network helps show where William Mark Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Mark Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Mark Ford Line = papers co-authored together William Mark Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 239 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005145
2 2005141
3 1999115
4 199589
5 200488
6 201182
7 200280
8 200280
9 200674
10 201674
11 201173
12 200371
13 200865
14 200964
15 200256
16 200152
17 200250
18 201450
19 200048
20 200148

About William Mark Ford

William Mark Ford is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 239 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (91 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (88 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (26 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (19 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (8 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Ecology (1.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (148 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (408 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (672 citations). William Mark Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Michael Menzel, John W. Edwards, Jennifer M. Menzel, Joshua Johnson, Steven B. Castleberry, Jane L. Rodrigue, Karl V. Miller, Alexander Silvis, Brian R. Chapman and Petra Bohall Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Wildlife Management, Endangered Species Research, PLoS ONE and Ecosphere.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact