William M. Johnson

63 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

William M. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Aging 33
  • Ophthalmology 135
  • Biochemistry 110
  • Neurology 115
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
Replace Wolfgang Schütz with:
Wolfgang Schütz Austria
Jian Zhang China
Joan D. Ferraris United States
Daniel G. Cyr Canada
Shifra Ben‐Dor Israel
Yumei Li China
Reijo Käkelä Finland
Jan M. Spitsbergen United States
R. S. Rana India
Hélène Lemieux Canada
William M. Johnson relative to Wolfgang Schütz Austria Wolfgang Schütz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Wolfgang Schütz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Johnson. The network helps show where William M. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William M. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together William M. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012291
2 201698
3 199671
4 201265
5 201558
6 201548
7 197443
8 195143
9 201438
10 197838
11 195636
12 202030
13 197130
14 201629
15 197929
16 198728
17 197727
18
Effect of grazing intensity upon vegetation and cattle gains on ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ranges of the Front Range of Colorado
195326
19 200525
20 202025

About William M. Johnson

William M. Johnson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Plant Science, Anthropology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (5 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Ophthalmology (135 citations), Biochemistry (110 citations), Neurology (115 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (19 citations). William M. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and India. Frequent co-authors include John J. Mieyal, Amy L. Wilson‐Delfosse, D. W. S. Westlake, D. R. Rao, W. Daniel Stamer, Michael A. Hauser, Arthur F. DiSalvo, D. M. Lavigne, Inas F. Aboobakar and R. Rand Allingham. Their work appears in journals such as Human Molecular Genetics, The FASEB Journal, Journal of Animal Science, Crop Science and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact