William M. Fields
Impact in
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development
Papers in
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development 8
-
- Language and cultural evolution 7
- Co-authors
- E. Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh (4 shared papers)Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh (8 shared papers)Jared P. Taglialatela (3 shared papers)Duane M. Rumbaugh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science (1 paper)Culture & Psychology (1 paper)Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (1 paper)Biology & Philosophy (1 paper)American Anthropologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William M. Fields
13 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Developmental Biology 40
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 216
- Cultural Studies 103
- Social Psychology 233
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
Countries citing papers authored by William M. Fields
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Fields more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Fields
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Fields. The network helps show where William M. Fields may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside William M. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 425 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 8 | Language, speech, tools and writing. A cultural imperative | 2001 | 10 |
| 9 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 12 | Why Apes Point : Pointing Gestures in Spontaneous Conversation of Language-Competent Pan/Homo Bonobos | 2009 | 4 |
| 13 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 1 |
About William M. Fields
William M. Fields is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cultural Studies, Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers), Language and cultural evolution (7 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (1 paper), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper) and Social Representations and Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (40 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (216 citations), Cultural Studies (103 citations), Social Psychology (233 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations). William M. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh, Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh, Jared P. Taglialatela and Duane M. Rumbaugh. Their work appears in journals such as THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science, Culture & Psychology, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, Biology & Philosophy and American Anthropologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.