William M. Fields

11 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

William M. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental Biology 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 205
  • Social Psychology 233
  • Cultural Studies 84
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 18
Replace James L. Pate with:
James L. Pate United States
Cintia Rodríguez Spain
Deborah Keller‐Cohen United States
Karen Brakke United States
Sherman Wilcox United States
Neha Mahajan United States
Talbot J. Taylor United States
Alia Martin United States
Grant J. Rich United States
Harold D. Fishbein United States
William M. Fields relative to James L. Pate United States James L. Pate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James L. Pate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Fields. The network helps show where William M. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William M. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William M. Fields Line = papers co-authored together William M. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2000348
2 200183
3 200525
4 200517
5 200016
6 200014
7
Language, speech, tools and writing. A cultural imperative
200111
8 200410
9 20087
10 20004
11
Why Apes Point : Pointing Gestures in Spontaneous Conversation of Language-Competent Pan/Homo Bonobos
20094

About William M. Fields

William M. Fields is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cultural Studies, Social Psychology, Developmental Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language and cultural evolution (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (37 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (205 citations), Social Psychology (233 citations), Cultural Studies (84 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (18 citations). William M. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh, Sue Savage‐Rumbaugh, Jared P. Taglialatela, Pablo del Río, Jordi Serrallonga, Alan Costall, Maria Clotilde T. Rossetti-Ferreira, Jaan Valsiner, Emily Abbey and Tania Zittoun. Their work appears in journals such as Biology & Philosophy, THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, American Anthropologist and Culture & Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact