William Laure

433 citations
9 papers · 356 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William Laure

9 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

William Laure
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 95
  • Biomaterials 101
  • Biomedical Engineering 148
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 52
  • Molecular Medicine 13
Replace Renpeng Gu with:
Renpeng Gu United States
Zaki G. Estephan United States
René Schubel Germany
Andreas Weidner Germany
Andrea Lassenberger Austria
Joshua Seaberg United States
Joshua Moskowitz United States
Killugudi Swaminatha Iyer Australia
Nathalie M. Pinkerton United States
William Laure relative to Renpeng Gu United States Renpeng Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Renpeng Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Laure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Laure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Laure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Laure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Laure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Laure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Laure. The network helps show where William Laure may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Laure, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Laure Line = papers co-authored together William Laure links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013115
2 201574
3 201356
4 201441
5 201421
6 201321
7 201813
8 202012
9 20173

About William Laure

William Laure is a scholar working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (95 citations), Biomaterials (101 citations), Biomedical Engineering (148 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (52 citations) and Molecular Medicine (13 citations). William Laure has collaborated with scholars based in France, Romania and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Patrice Woisel, Joël Lyskawa, Alexandre Barras, Sabine Szunerits, Rabah Boukherroub, Kostiantyn Turcheniuk, Nicolas Blanchemain, Andrei Galatanu, Feng Chai and V. Kuncser. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Materials Science and Engineering C, Analytical Chemistry and Chemistry of Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact