William Keyes
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 1
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 3
- Co-authors
- Wendy R. K. Smoker (4 shared papers)James J. Corbett (2 shared papers)Lindell R. Gentry (2 shared papers)Rachel Kaletsky (6 shared papers)Coleen T. Murphy (6 shared papers)Salman Sohrabi (3 shared papers)Danielle E. Mor (3 shared papers)Rachel N. Arey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Neuroradiology (3 papers)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
William Keyes
12 papers receiving 726 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Aging 133
- Neurology 250
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 63
- Biological Psychiatry 16
- Neurology 45
Countries citing papers authored by William Keyes
This map shows the geographic impact of William Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keyes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Keyes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keyes. The network helps show where William Keyes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High-resolution computed tomography of the basilar artery: 2. Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: clinical-pathologic correlation and review. | 1986 | 196 |
| 2 | High-resolution computed tomography of the basilar artery: 1. Normal size and position. | 1986 | 142 |
| 3 | 2020 | 113 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 112 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 11 | The Role of MR Imaging in Evaluating Metastatic Spinal Disease | 1987 | 6 |
| 12 | Magnetic resonance characterization of non-flowing intravascular blood. | 1986 | 5 |
About William Keyes
William Keyes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Aging and Surgery, having authored 12 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (133 citations), Neurology (250 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (63 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations) and Neurology (45 citations). William Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Wendy R. K. Smoker, James J. Corbett, Lindell R. Gentry, Rachel Kaletsky, Coleen T. Murphy, Salman Sohrabi, Danielle E. Mor, Rachel N. Arey, Vrinda Kalia and Amanda Kauffman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Neuroradiology, Nature Biotechnology, Neuron, Current Biology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.