William Karush

28 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

William Karush
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Numerical Analysis 81
  • Management Information Systems 103
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 177
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 68
  • Management Science and Operations Research 44
Replace Peter Nash with:
Peter Nash United Kingdom
Franz E. Hohn United States
Thomas Stern United States
Jon Folkman United States
Václav Fabian United States
John J. Dinkel United States
W. B. Jurkat Germany
D. J. Hartfiel United States
M. Viot France
Anthony L. Peressini United States
William Karush relative to Peter Nash United Kingdom Peter Nash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Nash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Karush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Karush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Karush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Karush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Karush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Karush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Karush. The network helps show where William Karush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside William Karush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Karush Line = papers co-authored together William Karush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195182
2 195754
3 195154
4 195945
5 196231
6 196224
7 196623
8 196122
9 196319
10 195118
11 195815
12
Webster's New World Dictionary of Mathematics
198912
13 195210
14 196210
15 19639
16 19528
17 19677
18 19577
19 19584
20 19514

About William Karush

William Karush is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (5 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (4 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (4 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (3 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (3 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (2 papers) and Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (81 citations), Management Information Systems (103 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (177 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (68 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (44 citations). William Karush has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Bellman, Magnus R. Hestenes, J. Barkley Rosser, Andrew Vázsonyi, Gale Young, Cornelius Lanczos and D. S.. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Operations Research, Canadian Journal of Mathematics and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact