William J. Wolfe

50 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

William J. Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Water Science and Technology 185
  • Aerospace Engineering 297
  • Computer Networks and Communications 217
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
  • Ecology 186
Replace R. Stokey with:
R. Stokey United States
Ryan N. Smith United States
Martin Ludvigsen Norway
Arnt-Børre Salberg Norway
Anil Kumar India
Frédéric Py United States
Yang He China
Austin M. Jensen United States
Toshihiro Maki Japan
Wei Gao China
William J. Wolfe relative to R. Stokey United States R. Stokey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
R. Stokey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Wolfe. The network helps show where William J. Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William J. Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William J. Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together William J. Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000236
2 199190
3 199162
4 198959
5 201553
6 201239
7 201138
8 201337
9 200736
10 200635
11 200429
12 201621
13 201414
14 199310
15 20029
16 20107
17 19877
18 20206
19 20065
20 19975

About William J. Wolfe

William J. Wolfe is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ecology, Water Science and Technology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 58 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (10 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (10 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (9 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (6 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers) and Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (185 citations), Aerospace Engineering (297 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (217 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (103 citations) and Ecology (186 citations). William J. Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Rodney R. Knight, Donald W. Mathis, Michael Magee, Morris Maizels, Jennifer C. Murphy, Jennifer Cartwright, Sandra Pool, Marc Vis, Jan Seibert and Allen C. Gellis. Their work appears in journals such as Ecohydrology, Water, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association and Applied Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact