William I. Ford

42 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

William I. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Environmental Chemistry 530
  • Water Science and Technology 570
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 217
  • Soil Science 268
  • Earth-Surface Processes 184
Replace D. Q. Kellogg with:
D. Q. Kellogg United States
G. Shortle United Kingdom
Micheal Stone Canada
William W. Simpkins United States
Clément Duvert Australia
Margaret Zimmer United States
John W. Brakebill United States
Masanori Katsuyama Japan
M J Hinton Canada
D. L. Karwan United States
William I. Ford relative to D. Q. Kellogg United States D. Q. Kellogg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
D. Q. Kellogg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William I. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William I. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William I. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William I. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William I. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William I. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William I. Ford. The network helps show where William I. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William I. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William I. Ford Line = papers co-authored together William I. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016124
2 2015103
3 201973
4 201655
5 201936
6 201233
7 201931
8 201630
9 201728
10 201327
11 201726
12 201824
13 201923
14 201421
15 201521
16 201521
17 201518
18 201718
19 202217
20 201716

About William I. Ford

William I. Ford is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (33 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (29 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (15 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (9 papers), Karst Systems and Hydrogeology (7 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (6 papers) and Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (530 citations), Water Science and Technology (570 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (217 citations), Soil Science (268 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (184 citations). William I. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James F. Fox, Kevin W. King, Mark R. Williams, Admin Husic, Erik D. Pollock, Carmen T. Agouridis, Anthony R. Buda, Casey D. Kennedy, Norman R. Fausey and James C. Currens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydrology, Hydrological Processes, Water Resources Research, Journal of Environmental Quality and Transactions of the ASABE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact