William Hoff

2.8k citations
64 papers · 2.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

William Hoff

60 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

William Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 993
  • Human-Computer Interaction 161
  • Surgery 1.0k
  • Geology 95
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 57
Replace D.W. Murray with:
D.W. Murray United Kingdom
Peter Allen United States
Xin Ma China
Qinping Zhao China
Marie‐Odile Berger France
Anton Deguet United States
Daniel Pizarro Spain
Daisuke Deguchi Japan
Jérémie Allard France
William Hoff relative to D.W. Murray United Kingdom D.W. Murray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
D.W. Murray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hoff. The network helps show where William Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hoff Line = papers co-authored together William Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996286
2 2004261
3 2003253
4 1989246
5 2017224
6 1998165
7 200278
8 200077
9 199674
10 200271
11 200252
12 200446
13 200445
14 199236
15
EXTRACTING SURFACES FROM STEREO IMAGES: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH.
198723
16 198322
17 202022
18
SURFACES FROM STEREO.
198621
19 201320
20 200220

About William Hoff

William Hoff is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aerospace Engineering, Surgery, Geology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (23 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (12 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (11 papers), Image and Object Detection Techniques (8 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (8 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (8 papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (7 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (993 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (161 citations), Surgery (1.0k citations), Geology (95 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (57 citations). William Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Richard D. Komistek, Douglas A. Dennis, Mohamed R. Mahfouz, Narendra Ahuja, Stefan Gabriel, Brian Reily, Hao Zhang, Fei Han, Tyrone L. Vincent and Scott A. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact