William Hatcher

844 citations
75 papers · 548 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Hatcher

55 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

William Hatcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Public Administration 63
  • Theoretical Computer Science 22
  • History and Philosophy of Science 28
  • Communication 39
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 68
Replace Elaine Landry with:
Elaine Landry United States
John Williams United Kingdom
Charles C. Alexander United States
Gert H. Müller United States
Anil Gupta United States
Martin Schröder Germany
Paul Higgins United Kingdom
Nicholas Harrigan Australia
John Woods Canada
Hans Hahn Germany
William Hatcher relative to Elaine Landry United States Elaine Landry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Elaine Landry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hatcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hatcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hatcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hatcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hatcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hatcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hatcher. The network helps show where William Hatcher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Hatcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hatcher Line = papers co-authored together William Hatcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970123
2 202072
3 202134
4 200928
5 202027
6 200925
7 201916
8 201515
9 201814
10 197213
11 201812
12
The Baha'I Faith: The Emerging Global Religion
198612
13 201111
14 197611
15 197011
16 19829
17 20198
18 20188
19 20226
20 20186

About William Hatcher

William Hatcher is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Education, having authored 75 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (12 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers), E-Government and Public Services (5 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (3 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (3 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (63 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (28 citations), Communication (39 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (68 citations). William Hatcher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Erwin Engeler, Wesley L. Meares, Bruce D. McDonald, Catherine Farrell, John Diamond, Robert J. Buchanan, Timothy Vollmer, Tuula Tyry, A. M. Hammond and Lori A. Brainard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Affairs Education, American Journal of Public Health, Zygon®, Public Integrity and Public Administration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact