William H. Baxter

1.3k citations
12 papers · 394 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William H. Baxter

11 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

William H. Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Linguistics and Language 102
  • Language and Linguistics 135
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
  • Cultural Studies 53
  • Religious studies 28
Replace Axel Schuessler with:
Axel Schuessler United States
Nathan W. Hill United Kingdom
Wolfgang Behr Switzerland
Bernhard Karlgren United States
R. E. Asher United Kingdom
William G. Boltz Germany
Gilbert Lazard France
Manuel Alvar Spain
Tore Janson Sweden
Robert S. P. Beekes Netherlands
William H. Baxter relative to Axel Schuessler United States Axel Schuessler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Axel Schuessler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Baxter. The network helps show where William H. Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside William H. Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William H. Baxter Line = papers co-authored together William H. Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1992210
2 2014134
3 200914
4 199812
5 19966
6 20175
7 20065
8 19874
9 20062
10
Some notes on the tardigrada of north down northern ireland uk including 1 addition to the irish fauna
19791
11
Zhōu and Hàn phonology in the Shījīng
19911
12 20170

About William H. Baxter

William H. Baxter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Tardigrade Biology and Ecology (1 paper), Bryophyte Studies and Records (1 paper) and Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (102 citations), Language and Linguistics (135 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Cultural Studies (53 citations) and Religious studies (28 citations). William H. Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Morocco and France. Frequent co-authors include Laurent Sagart, E. G. Pulleyblank, Paul W. Kroll, William G. Boltz and David R. Knechtges. Their work appears in journals such as Diachronica, Cahiers de linguistique - Asie orientale, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact