William H. Baumer
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life 1
-
- History of Science and Medicine 1
- Co-authors
- Robert Paul Wolff (1 shared paper)Wesley C. Salmon (1 shared paper)Julius Weinberg (1 shared paper)Daniel Lerner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (6 papers)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (1 paper)The Monist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William H. Baumer
10 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- History and Philosophy of Science 46
- Philosophy 83
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
- General Psychology 4
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 38
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Baumer
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Baumer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Baumer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Baumer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Baumer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Baumer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Baumer. The network helps show where William H. Baumer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside William H. Baumer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1964 | 63 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 30 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1964 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 0 |
About William H. Baumer
William H. Baumer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (1 paper), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper), American Sports and Literature (1 paper) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), Philosophy (83 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (38 citations). William H. Baumer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Paul Wolff, Wesley C. Salmon, Julius Weinberg and Daniel Lerner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Quarterly, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and The Monist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.