William Grey

16 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

William Grey
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management Information Systems 64
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 58
  • History and Philosophy of Science 16
  • Marketing 26
  • Geography, Planning and Development 16
Replace Henryk Skolimowski with:
Henryk Skolimowski United States
Frederick Ferré United States
Michael P. Malone United States
Henry E. Lowood United States
Peter Simmons Australia
John A. Barnes United States
Rob Hagendijk Netherlands
Geof Bowker France
Stephen H. Cutcliffe United States
William Rasch United States
William Grey relative to Henryk Skolimowski United States Henryk Skolimowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.8×
Henryk Skolimowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Grey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Grey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Grey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Grey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Grey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Grey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Grey. The network helps show where William Grey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside William Grey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Grey Line = papers co-authored together William Grey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199366
2 200564
3 200942
4 200322
5 199920
6 199918
7
Metaphor and meaning
200017
8 199612
9 198611
10 19879
11 19976
12
A critique of deep green theory
20002
13 20002
14 20072
15 19962
16 20051
17
A Case for Investigating the Ethics of Artificial Life
20031
18 20050

About William Grey

William Grey is a scholar working on Philosophy, Nature and Landscape Conservation, History and Philosophy of Science, Management Information Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (64 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (58 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations), Marketing (26 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (16 citations). William Grey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Dan Shi, Paul E. Griffiths, Mark Colyvan, Stefan Linquist, Jay Odenbaugh, Hugh P. Possingham, Guillermo Gallego, Kaan Katırcıoğlu, Sugato Bagchi and Adrian Carter. Their work appears in journals such as IBM Systems Journal, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Environmental Values, The American Journal of Bioethics and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact