William Gooddy

713 citations
42 papers · 467 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Gooddy

39 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

William Gooddy
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • General Psychology 7
  • Neurology 65
  • Neurology 31
Replace Eugene M. Taylor with:
Eugene M. Taylor United States
G.C. Lairy France
Ninni Persson Sweden
György Ádám Hungary
Howard L. Cohen United States
R Hess Switzerland
James P. Bowman United States
K.‐D. Kniffki Germany
F. Richer Canada
Terrence D. Oleson United States
William Gooddy relative to Eugene M. Taylor United States Eugene M. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Eugene M. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Gooddy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Gooddy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Gooddy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Gooddy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Gooddy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Gooddy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Gooddy. The network helps show where William Gooddy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside William Gooddy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Gooddy Line = papers co-authored together William Gooddy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966130
2 195236
3 196031
4 197229
5 195728
6 197424
7 195820
8 196117
9 197515
10 195113
11 197810
12 195610
13 19649
14 19849
15 19538
16 19607
17 19827
18 19696
19 19545
20 19705

About William Gooddy

William Gooddy is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology, Rheumatology, History and Molecular Biology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (8 papers), Medical History and Innovations (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper) and Medical History and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Neurology (65 citations) and Neurology (31 citations). William Gooddy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Mannie M. Schechter, Peter Rudge, D. J. D. Nicholas, Wylie McKissock, M J Harrison, A. D. Dayan, E.I. Hamilton, E. Susan Clark, David Isenberg and David McAuley. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, The Lancet, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and Perspectives in biology and medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact