William G. Keyes

632 citations
12 papers · 576 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William G. Keyes

12 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

William G. Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Biochemistry 87
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 130
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 109
  • Genetics 57
  • Hematology 53
Replace F. Stanley Porter with:
F. Stanley Porter United States
John Hussey United States
Ernest R. Simon United States
Susan F Travis United States
N. Cester Italy
O Oetliker Switzerland
A. M. Dall’Omo Italy
G Di Bitonto Italy
Mark S. Harvey Netherlands
Amos Lanir Israel
William G. Keyes relative to F. Stanley Porter United States F. Stanley Porter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
F. Stanley Porter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Keyes. The network helps show where William G. Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside William G. Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Keyes Line = papers co-authored together William G. Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1991118
2 1979101
3 198994
4
Assessing the need for transfusion of premature infants and role of hematocrit, clinical signs, and erythropoietin level.
198991
5 198149
6 199248
7 198230
8 198218
9 198215
10 198210
11 19971
12 19901

About William G. Keyes

William G. Keyes is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (87 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (130 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (109 citations), Genetics (57 citations) and Hematology (53 citations). William G. Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Murray Heimberg, Mathew Jones, Jerry L. Spivak, Frank A. Oski, Timothy R.B. Johnson, Jennifer R. Niebyl, Richard E. Besinger, Henry G. Wilcox, Pamela Donohue and Douglas W. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Endocrinology, Journal of Lipid Research, Metabolism, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Journal of Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact