William G. Frederick

20 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers

William G. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 378
  • Developmental Biology 25
  • Global and Planetary Change 226
  • Ecology 222
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
Replace Kagari Aoki with:
Kagari Aoki Japan
M. Kato Japan
Erik R. Olson United States
Dirk Bumann Germany
Dean A. Bagley United States
Brendan Borrell United States
Charles C. Peterson United States
M. C. Santos Brazil
Shinji Kamimura Japan
Derek W. Larson Canada
William G. Frederick relative to Kagari Aoki Japan Kagari Aoki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Kagari Aoki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Frederick. The network helps show where William G. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William G. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together William G. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006320
2 1975111
3 198281
4 200979
5 200753
6 199321
7 200319
8 19939
9 19908
10 20076
11 19745
12 19524
13 19882
14 19742
15 19841
16 19851
17 19841
18 19951
19 19951
20 19861

About William G. Frederick

William G. Frederick is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (2 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (378 citations), Developmental Biology (25 citations), Global and Planetary Change (226 citations), Ecology (222 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (103 citations). William G. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William E. Cooper, V. U. S. Rao, H. J. Garrett, S. G. Sankar, E. Segal, W.E. Wallace, Donald K. MacCallum, Lawrence J. Scaletta, John H. Lillie and Steven Ledbetter. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Journal of Applied Physics, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Experimental Cell Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact