William Ferguson

57 papers receiving 1.5k citations

William Ferguson's Hit Papers

Tropical animal health and production 1970 · 554 citations
5540+18+37Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

William Ferguson
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Internal Medicine 81
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 156
  • Animal Science and Zoology 127
  • Hematology 113
  • Small Animals 76
Replace Wim Coucke with:
Wim Coucke Belgium
Clayton Deming United States
Egon Marth Austria
Alain Le Faou France
Inger Mattsby‐Baltzer Sweden
Jonathan Porter United Kingdom
Daniel J. O’Brien United States
Charles P. Davis United States
Aaron Rendahl United States
Fernando Vázquez Spain
William Ferguson relative to Wim Coucke Belgium Wim Coucke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Wim Coucke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ferguson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ferguson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ferguson. The network helps show where William Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Ferguson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ferguson Line = papers co-authored together William Ferguson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Tropical animal health and production
Hit paper breakdown →
1970554
2 1991244
3 2002151
4 201886
5 199038
6 201635
7 199934
8 201525
9 199624
10 201522
11 199522
12 196622
13 201321
14 199621
15 199020
16 199520
17 199518
18 201416
19 199316
20 199515

About William Ferguson

William Ferguson is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Building and Construction, Biomedical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wood Treatment and Properties (6 papers), Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Hygrothermal properties of building materials (5 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (4 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (4 papers), Epoxy Resin Curing Processes (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (81 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (156 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (127 citations), Hematology (113 citations) and Small Animals (76 citations). William Ferguson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gillian J.C. McNeillage, W.J. Herbert, Ian Turner, B. Burt Gerstman, Joyce M. Piper, Dianne Tomita, Frank E. Lundin, Bruce V. Stadel, Gerald J. Kost and Abinash Agrawal. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic Review, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review, Applied Mathematical Modelling and Drying Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact