William E. Williams

1.5k citations
24 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Williams

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Global and Planetary Change 400
  • Plant Science 599
  • Atmospheric Science 202
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 91
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 139
Replace Mark D. Mackenzie with:
Mark D. Mackenzie United Kingdom
Victor R. Weidner United States
P. Mazzinghi Italy
Jessica A. Savage United States
Y. Iida Japan
Nicholas A. Martin United Kingdom
R. Lösch Germany
Richard Lindsay Belgium
Xiaodi Liu China
Leonid Fukshansky Germany
William E. Williams relative to Mark D. Mackenzie United Kingdom Mark D. Mackenzie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Mark D. Mackenzie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Williams. The network helps show where William E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside William E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together William E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986215
2 1984156
3 2007114
4 1991100
5 198978
6 198967
7 198165
8 200151
9 199949
10 200543
11 200341
12 201040
13 198332
14 198832
15 198328
16 198323
17 200423
18 199818
19 198914
20 198513

About William E. Williams

William E. Williams is a scholar working on Plant Science, Computational Mechanics, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials and Ecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (7 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (4 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (400 citations), Plant Science (599 citations), Atmospheric Science (202 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (91 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (139 citations). William E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Holly L. Gorton, F. A. Bazzaz, M. J. Soileau, Eric W. Van Stryland, Thomas C. Vogelmann, K. Garbutt, Peter M. Vitousek, Craig R. Brodersen, Nastaran Mansour and Arthur L. Smirl. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Cell & Environment, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Physiologia Plantarum and Optical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact