William E. Pine

98 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

William E. Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Aquatic Science 142
  • Ecology 347
  • Statistics and Probability 80
Replace Michael J. Bradford with:
Michael J. Bradford Canada
Richard W. Zabel United States
Aaron J. Adams United States
R. I. C. C. Francis New Zealand
Daniel Hayes United States
Eduardo Guimarães Martins Canada
Matthew L. Keefer United States
Carolina V. Minte‐Vera United States
Ola Ugedal Norway
Greg G. Sass United States
William E. Pine relative to Michael J. Bradford Canada Michael J. Bradford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Michael J. Bradford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Pine. The network helps show where William E. Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Pine Line = papers co-authored together William E. Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003280
2 2007215
3 2007158
4 2010100
5 201174
6 200171
7 201169
8 201564
9 201260
10 201557
11 200055
12 200655
13 200955
14 200653
15 200750
16 200549
17 200144
18 200443
19 200840
20 202039

About William E. Pine

William E. Pine is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Aquatic Science, Ecology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (59 papers), Marine and fisheries research (29 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (18 papers), Census and Population Estimation (7 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (3 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Aquatic Science (142 citations), Ecology (347 citations) and Statistics and Probability (80 citations). William E. Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth H. Pollock, Carl J. Walters, Thomas J. Kwak, Micheal S. Allen, Lewis G. Coggins, Joseph E. Hightower, Matthew J. Catalano, Steven J.D. Martell, Edward Vincent Camp and Michael D. Yard. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, River Research and Applications, Marine and Coastal Fisheries and Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact