William E. Pine

96 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

William E. Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
  • Aquatic Science 624
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.4k
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Water Science and Technology 276
Replace Richard W. Zabel with:
Richard W. Zabel United States
Tor F. Næsje Norway
Ola Ugedal Norway
Martha E. Mather United States
Greg G. Sass United States
Zeb Hogan United States
Andrew L. Rypel United States
Harold L. Schramm United States
John M. Dettmers United States
Christopher A. Myrick United States
William E. Pine relative to Richard W. Zabel United States Richard W. Zabel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Richard W. Zabel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Pine. The network helps show where William E. Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Pine Line = papers co-authored together William E. Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003281
2 2007216
3 2007159
4 201098
5 200176
6 201172
7 201171
8 201561
9 201259
10 200658
11 200656
12 201555
13 200055
14 200954
15 200750
16 200549
17 200147
18 200443
19 200841
20 200041

About William E. Pine

William E. Pine is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology and Aquatic Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (72 papers), Marine and fisheries research (54 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (19 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (18 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (15 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (13 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (13 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations), Aquatic Science (624 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Water Science and Technology (276 citations). William E. Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth H. Pollock, Carl J. Walters, Micheal S. Allen, Thomas J. Kwak, Lewis G. Coggins, James A. Rice, Joseph E. Hightower, Matthew J. Catalano, Steven J.D. Martell and Edward V. Camp. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, River Research and Applications, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Marine and Coastal Fisheries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact