William E. Loges

1.4k citations
17 papers · 1.1k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Loges

17 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

William E. Loges
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Communication 259
  • Information Systems and Management 107
  • Sociology and Political Science 580
  • Public Administration 40
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
Replace Lutz Erbring with:
Lutz Erbring United States
Elfreda A. Chatman United States
Malcolm Brynin United Kingdom
Michael Chan Hong Kong
Tanja Bosch South Africa
Anthony McCosker Australia
Thomas N. Friemel Switzerland
Anne Hendershott United States
Gary Gumpert United States
Hans‐Georg Wolff Germany
William E. Loges relative to Lutz Erbring United States Lutz Erbring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Lutz Erbring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Loges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Loges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Loges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Loges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Loges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Loges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Loges. The network helps show where William E. Loges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William E. Loges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Loges Line = papers co-authored together William E. Loges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2001323
2 2006176
3 1994143
4 199385
5 200385
6 200667
7 199465
8 199428
9 199919
10 200815
11 200712
12 200010
13
The media and morality
19998
14 20057
15 20054
16 20033
17 20163

About William E. Loges

William E. Loges is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Social Psychology and General Social Sciences, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Social Capital and Networks (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (259 citations), Information Systems and Management (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (580 citations), Public Administration (40 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations). William E. Loges has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joo-Young Jung, Sandra J. Ball‐Rokeach, J. Kevin Barge, Daniel M. Mayton, Christopher Weare, Juliet Musso, Jon Bruschke and Robert Baird. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Issues, Communication Research, Journal of Social Philosophy, Journal of Applied Communication Research and Social Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact