William E. Good
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Atomic and Molecular Physics
Papers in
-
- Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies 4
-
- Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure 4
- Co-authors
- Donald K. Coles (3 shared papers)Richard Hughes (1 shared paper)Amandus H. Sharbaugh (1 shared paper)John K. Bragg (1 shared paper)Robert L. White (1 shared paper)ARTHUR L. SCHAWLOW (1 shared paper)Hs. H. Günthard (2 shared papers)ALFRED BAUDER (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics (1 paper)Helvetica Chimica Acta (1 paper)Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy (1 paper)Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Broadcast and Television Receivers (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William E. Good
8 papers receiving 178 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Spectroscopy 134
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 52
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 13
- Media Technology 7
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 2
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Good
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Good. The network helps show where William E. Good may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside William E. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1951 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1954 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1951 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1972 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 1 |
About William E. Good
William E. Good is a scholar working on Media Technology, Spectroscopy, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmaceutical Science and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (4 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers), Advanced optical system design (3 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (1 paper) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (134 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (52 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (13 citations), Media Technology (7 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (2 citations). William E. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Donald K. Coles, Richard Hughes, Amandus H. Sharbaugh, John K. Bragg, Robert L. White, ARTHUR L. SCHAWLOW, Hs. H. Günthard, ALFRED BAUDER, Heinrich E. Hunziker and Rolf Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology and IEEE Transactions on Broadcast and Television Receivers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.