William E. Field

62 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

William E. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 110
  • Plant Science 284
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 18
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 30
Replace David I. Douphrate with:
David I. Douphrate United States
Susan Westneat United States
Melvin L. Myers United States
Niels Koehncke Canada
Peter Lundqvist Sweden
Steven R. Kirkhorn United States
Ann K. Carruth United States
Dean Stueland United States
Henry P. Cole United States
Jo Anne G. Balanay United States
William E. Field relative to David I. Douphrate United States David I. Douphrate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David I. Douphrate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Field. The network helps show where William E. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside William E. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Field Line = papers co-authored together William E. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199084
2 200740
3 200927
4 199821
5 200818
6 200815
7 200514
8 198412
9 201711
10 200611
11 200310
12 202110
13 201810
14 20119
15 20139
16 19828
17 20068
18 19737
19 20117
20 20177

About William E. Field

William E. Field is a scholar working on Plant Science, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Philosophy and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture and Farm Safety (53 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (14 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (4 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (4 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (110 citations), Plant Science (284 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (18 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (30 citations). William E. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Jones, Steven A. Freeman, Donald B. Kraybill, Dirk E. Maier, Ji‐Qin Ni, Salah F. Issa, Brian F. French, Martin J. Frick, Daniel R. Ess and Eric A. Nauman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, Assistive Technology, Journal of Agromedicine, Journal of Safety Research and Journal of Nursing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact