William E. Faught

666 citations
14 papers · 504 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Faught

14 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

William E. Faught
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Internal Medicine 50
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 264
  • Surgery 192
  • Emergency Medicine 37
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
Replace Ronald L. Kirshner with:
Ronald L. Kirshner United States
José CC Baptista-Silva Brazil
James M. Salander United States
Edward J. Marcaccio United States
Lynn M. Fedoruk Canada
B Vidne Israel
Bengt Åberg Sweden
S. H. Yale United States
Donald L. Jacobs United States
Francis J. Harford United States
William E. Faught relative to Ronald L. Kirshner United States Ronald L. Kirshner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ronald L. Kirshner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Faught

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Faught's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Faught with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Faught more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Faught

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Faught. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Faught. The network helps show where William E. Faught may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside William E. Faught, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Faught Line = papers co-authored together William E. Faught links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1994137
2 199467
3 199364
4 198952
5 199547
6 199245
7 199339
8 199213
9 200811
10 19928
11 19937
12 19906
13 19725
14 19933

About William E. Faught

William E. Faught is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Dermatology and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (50 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (264 citations), Surgery (192 citations), Emergency Medicine (37 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (80 citations). William E. Faught has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Don E. Ramsey, Lynne D. Barkmeier, Kim J. Hodgson, Mark A. Mattos, David S. Sumner, Paul S. van Bemmelen, Edward William Nelson, Jeffrey J. Gilbertson, Malek Mansour and Richard E. Black. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Surgical Clinics of North America, Annals of Vascular Surgery and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact