William E. Conner

3.0k citations
60 papers · 2.5k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Conner

59 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

William E. Conner
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Developmental Biology 480
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
  • Insect Science 806
  • Genetics 817
  • Ecological Modeling 117
Replace Jayne E. Yack with:
Jayne E. Yack Canada
Leena Lindström Finland
John Skelhorn United Kingdom
J. D. López United States
Paul J. Weldon United States
Gabriella Gamberale‐Stille Sweden
Rafael Maia United States
Elizabeth M. Jakob United States
Chutamas Satasook Thailand
Håkan Wittzell Sweden
William E. Conner relative to Jayne E. Yack Canada Jayne E. Yack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jayne E. Yack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Conner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Conner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Conner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Conner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Conner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Conner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Conner. The network helps show where William E. Conner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Conner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Conner Line = papers co-authored together William E. Conner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004298
2 1981169
3 2005147
4 2011128
5 1999125
6 1980121
7 2009119
8 1999102
9 200799
10
Tiger moths and woolly bears : behavior, ecology, and evolution of the Arctiidae
200996
11 200589
12 200077
13 201457
14 200553
15 200452
16 201249
17 198349
18 201645
19 197738
20 197637

About William E. Conner

William E. Conner is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (19 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (9 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (8 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (480 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Insect Science (806 citations), Genetics (817 citations) and Ecological Modeling (117 citations). William E. Conner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Cuba and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Aaron J. Corcoran, Jesse R. Barber, Thomas Eisner, Jerrold Meinwald, Nickolay I. Hristov, Tappey H. Jones, Ángel Guerrero, Robert Κ. Vander Meer, Susan J. Weller and John T. Arnason. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Science, Journal of Insect Behavior, Journal of Insect Science and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact