William Dyson
Impact in
- Virology top 10%
- Rabies epidemiology and control
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 4
- Surgery 2
- Co-authors
- Robert D. Utiger (1 shared paper)Charles H. Emerson (1 shared paper)Jay D. Amsterdam (2 shared papers)Andrew Winokur (2 shared papers)Bernhard Fleischer (1 shared paper)R. Rott (1 shared paper)Hilary Koprowski (1 shared paper)S. Herzog (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Environmental Science & Technology (1 paper)Digestive Diseases and Sciences (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Pharmacopsychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyPoland
In The Last Decade
William Dyson
13 papers receiving 426 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Virology 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 122
- Microbiology 49
- Biological Psychiatry 17
- Animal Science and Zoology 65
Countries citing papers authored by William Dyson
This map shows the geographic impact of William Dyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Dyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Dyson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Dyson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Dyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Dyson. The network helps show where William Dyson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside William Dyson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 243 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 113 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1968 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1965 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 |
About William Dyson
William Dyson is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Epidemiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Blood disorders and treatments (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Rabies epidemiology and control (1 paper) and Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (69 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (122 citations), Microbiology (49 citations), Biological Psychiatry (17 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (65 citations). William Dyson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Utiger, Charles H. Emerson, Jay D. Amsterdam, Andrew Winokur, Bernhard Fleischer, R. Rott, Hilary Koprowski, S. Herzog, Myer D. Mendelson and J. Mendels. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Environmental Science & Technology, Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Science and Pharmacopsychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.