William Cambridge
Impact in
-
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 3
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 1
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 1
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 2
- Medical Education and Admissions 1
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation 1
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 1
- Co-authors
- James C. Drennan (1 shared paper)Stephen J. Wigmore (2 shared papers)Ewen M. Harrison (3 shared papers)Kjetil Søreide (1 shared paper)Cameron J Fairfield (2 shared papers)James J. Powell (1 shared paper)Rachel V. Guest (1 shared paper)Sivesh K. Kamarajah (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- HPB (2 papers)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)British Journal of Urology (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorwayItaly
In The Last Decade
William Cambridge
12 papers receiving 266 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 120
- Hepatology 16
- Clinical Psychology 33
- Oncology 41
- Genetics 12
Countries citing papers authored by William Cambridge
This map shows the geographic impact of William Cambridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cambridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cambridge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Cambridge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cambridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cambridge. The network helps show where William Cambridge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Cambridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 |
About William Cambridge
William Cambridge is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Medical Education and Admissions (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (120 citations), Hepatology (16 citations), Clinical Psychology (33 citations), Oncology (41 citations) and Genetics (12 citations). William Cambridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James C. Drennan, Stephen J. Wigmore, Ewen M. Harrison, Kjetil Søreide, Cameron J Fairfield, James J. Powell, Rachel V. Guest, Sivesh K. Kamarajah, Kenneth A McLean and Kyle Raubenheimer. Their work appears in journals such as HPB, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Urology, BMJ Open and Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.