William Brown

24 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

William Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Insect Science 144
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 141
  • Genetics 125
  • Environmental Chemistry 36
  • Sensory Systems 15
Replace Peter C. Daniel with:
Peter C. Daniel United States
Luiz Carlos Serramo Lopez Brazil
CHARLES R. ALLEN United States
D. Ryan King United States
J. Christophersen Germany
William G. Evans Canada
Gene Kritsky United States
Valerie Bennett United States
Carrie Deans United States
Daniel J. White Australia
William Brown relative to Peter C. Daniel United States Peter C. Daniel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Peter C. Daniel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brown. The network helps show where William Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Brown Line = papers co-authored together William Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970214
2 196868
3 198458
4 198941
5 200535
6 201232
7 198521
8 195718
9 199216
10
The distal akin osteotomy: a new approach.
199211
11 19549
12 19798
13 20026
14 19785
15 19794
16 20154
17 19644
18 20183
19 19732
20 19712

About William Brown

William Brown is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 25 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers), Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Marine and environmental studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (144 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (141 citations), Genetics (125 citations), Environmental Chemistry (36 citations) and Sensory Systems (15 citations). William Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Eisner, R. H. Whittaker, Mark Groudine, David L. Bentley, Henry A. Wallace, Rebecca L. Collins, David K. Chen, Nick M. Wisdom, Geoffrey Ling and Audrey N. Kalehua. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Journal of Neurotrauma, Journal of neurosurgery, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact