William Bogard

772 citations
17 papers · 386 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Bogard

17 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

William Bogard
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Geography, Planning and Development 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 213
  • Communication 32
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 25
  • Urban Studies 14
Replace Loren Demerath with:
Loren Demerath United States
Elizabeth Long United States
Joost van Loon Netherlands
John Phillips Singapore
Erkan Saka Türkiye
I. Milojević Australia
Judith Love Cohen Israel
Tanya King Australia
Joan M. Schwartz Canada
Mario D. Zamora United States
William Bogard relative to Loren Demerath United States Loren Demerath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Loren Demerath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Bogard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Bogard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bogard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bogard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Bogard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bogard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bogard. The network helps show where William Bogard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside William Bogard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Bogard Line = papers co-authored together William Bogard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1997183
2 198854
3 199026
4 199024
5 199823
6 200021
7 199117
8 199910
9
The Coils of a Serpent: Haptic Space and Control Societies
20078
10 20088
11 19923
12 19872
13 20092
14 19872
15
Digital Resisto(e)rs
20101
16 19931
17 20191

About William Bogard

William Bogard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Clinical Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (2 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Disaster Response and Management (1 paper) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (213 citations), Communication (32 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (25 citations) and Urban Studies (14 citations). William Bogard has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Baldus and Dennis S. Mileti. Their work appears in journals such as Sociological Theory, Surveillance & Society, Space and Culture, Philosophy & Social Criticism and Canadian Public Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact