William Bickers

990 citations
45 papers · 291 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William Bickers

37 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

William Bickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Reproductive Medicine 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 24
Replace Gita P. Gidwani with:
Gita P. Gidwani United States
Jay J. Gold United States
J. H. Westergaard Denmark
Anna L. Southam United States
M Ostensen Norway
Emre Basatemür United Kingdom
Gwinnett M. Ladson United States
Robert Hayashi United States
Nimet Göker Türkiye
Maiza Tusimin Malaysia
William Bickers relative to Gita P. Gidwani United States Gita P. Gidwani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Gita P. Gidwani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Bickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Bickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Bickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bickers. The network helps show where William Bickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside William Bickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Bickers Line = papers co-authored together William Bickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197062
2
Premenstrual tension; rational treatment.
195130
3 195324
4 195616
5 196313
6 198313
7 195211
8 195110
9 195310
10 196010
11 19518
12 19608
13 19537
14 19516
15 19676
16 19525
17 19615
18 19514
19 19514
20 19534

About William Bickers

William Bickers is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, History and Philosophy of Science and History, having authored 45 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menstrual Health and Disorders (10 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Medical History and Innovations (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations), Reproductive Medicine (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (24 citations). William Bickers has collaborated with scholars based in Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Faysal M. Hasan. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JAMA, Fertility and Sterility, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact