William Baxter

1.5k citations
33 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

William Baxter

33 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

William Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 635
  • Computational Mechanics 480
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 491
  • Human-Computer Interaction 86
  • Geology 37
Replace Kenneth E. Hoff with:
Kenneth E. Hoff United States
Eric R. Chan United States
Francoise J. Preteux France
Qing Yan Shuai China
Zachi Karni Israel
Henry Johan Singapore
Nick Foster United States
O. Zaro Weber Israel
David Novotný United Kingdom
Dimitrios S. Alexiadis Greece
William Baxter relative to Kenneth E. Hoff United States Kenneth E. Hoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Kenneth E. Hoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baxter. The network helps show where William Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Baxter Line = papers co-authored together William Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003163
2 2011120
3 200496
4 200188
5 200268
6 202250
7 201846
8 200541
9 200741
10 201040
11 200734
12 200833
13 200432
14 200632
15 200930
16 200627
17 200424
18 201023
19 200619
20 200515

About William Baxter

William Baxter is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (20 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (18 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (9 papers), Radar Systems and Signal Processing (5 papers), Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (4 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (3 papers) and Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (635 citations), Computational Mechanics (480 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (491 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (86 citations) and Geology (37 citations). William Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Ken‐ichi Anjyo, Thorsten Scheuermann, Anselmo Lastra, Mark Harris, Dinesh Manocha, Elias Aboutanios, Naga K. Govindaraju, Jeremy Wendt, Aboulnasr Hassanien and Carl Erikson. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, PEDIATRICS, IET Radar Sonar & Navigation and Computer Graphics Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact