William B. Connick

78 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

William B. Connick
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.1k
  • Organic Chemistry 1.5k
  • Oncology 1.2k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 617
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 379
Replace Siu‐Wai Lai with:
Siu‐Wai Lai Hong Kong
Masa‐aki Haga Japan
Frédérique Loiseau France
Fausto Puntoriero Italy
Robert J. Crutchley Canada
Marı́a Teresa Indelli Italy
Michael C. W. Chan Hong Kong
Sergey P. Tunik Russia
Claudio Chiorboli Italy
Dominique Roberto Italy
William B. Connick relative to Siu‐Wai Lai Hong Kong Siu‐Wai Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Siu‐Wai Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William B. Connick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Connick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Connick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Connick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Connick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Connick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Connick. The network helps show where William B. Connick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William B. Connick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William B. Connick Line = papers co-authored together William B. Connick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000401
2 2000380
3 1998342
4 1997330
5 1996284
6 2004219
7 1999180
8 1997170
9 1995134
10 200890
11 200089
12 201281
13 200369
14 200565
15 200363
16 200257
17 201054
18 200749
19 200445
20 200341

About William B. Connick

William B. Connick is a scholar working on Oncology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (37 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (25 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (17 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (11 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (11 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (9 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (8 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k citations), Organic Chemistry (1.5k citations), Oncology (1.2k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (617 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (379 citations). William B. Connick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Eisenberg, Harry B. Gray, David K. Geiger, R.E. Marsh, Hershel Jude, R.J. Lachicotte, James E. McGarrah, Muriel Hissler, Jeanette A. Krause Bauer and Levi J. Grove. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact