William Ames

18 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

William Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Biophysics 188
  • Inorganic Chemistry 449
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 345
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 626
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 300
Replace Jeffrey M. Peloquin with:
Jeffrey M. Peloquin United States
Leonid Rapatskiy Germany
John H. Robblee United States
Warren F. Beck United States
Jean‐Luc Zimmermann France
Roehl M. Cinco United States
Vera Krewald Germany
Leonid V. Kulik Russia
Hiroshi Isobe Japan
Ron J. Pace Australia
William Ames relative to Jeffrey M. Peloquin United States Jeffrey M. Peloquin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jeffrey M. Peloquin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Ames. The network helps show where William Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Ames Line = papers co-authored together William Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012353
2 2011264
3 2012244
4 2013148
5 201181
6 201150
7 201037
8 200932
9 201529
10 201528
11 201227
12 200922
13 201320
14 200915
15 200914
16 20149
17 20076
18
Light-induced water oxidation in photosynthesis
20142

About William Ames

William Ames is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (10 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (6 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (2 papers) and Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (188 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (449 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (345 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (626 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (300 citations). William Ames has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Frank Neese, Nicholas J. Cox, Wolfgang Lubitz, Dimitrios A. Pantazis, Johannes Messinger, Leonid Rapatskiy, Sarah C. Larsen, Vera Krewald, Marc M. Nowaczyk and Alain Boussac. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Molecular Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact