William A. Souter

844 citations
21 papers · 665 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

William A. Souter

21 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

William A. Souter
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Rehabilitation 162
  • Developmental Biology 42
  • Surgery 327
  • Rheumatology 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
Replace R. Guy Pulvertaft with:
R. Guy Pulvertaft United Kingdom
Gunther Windisch Austria
Timothy J. Herbert Australia
Christopher J. Tuohy United States
Muhittin Şener Türkiye
Kiyoshi Kaneda Japan
Masuo Senda Japan
Roger Dee United States
Chee Kwang Low Singapore
Abdul Kader Martini Germany
William A. Souter relative to R. Guy Pulvertaft United Kingdom R. Guy Pulvertaft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.7×
R. Guy Pulvertaft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William A. Souter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William A. Souter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William A. Souter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William A. Souter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William A. Souter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William A. Souter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William A. Souter. The network helps show where William A. Souter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside William A. Souter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William A. Souter Line = papers co-authored together William A. Souter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997111
2 197379
3
Functional assessment of the rheumatoid hand.
197150
4 196749
5 197948
6 197446
7 197044
8 199042
9 196340
10 196631
11 198923
12 196520
13 198119
14
Autogenous cancellous strip grafts in the treatment of delayed union of long bone fractures.
196916
15 197712
16
The surgical treatment of the rheumatoid shoulder.
198311
17 19627
18 19716
19 20075
20 19714

About William A. Souter

William A. Souter is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cell Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (5 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (3 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper), Congenital limb and hand anomalies (1 paper) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (162 citations), Developmental Biology (42 citations), Surgery (327 citations), Rheumatology (59 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (46 citations). William A. Souter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas K. F. Taylor, J. G. Duncan, A T Redpath and A.O. Langlands. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Radiology, Orthopedic Clinics of North America and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact