Wilhelm Schabel

5.6k citations
175 papers · 4.8k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Wilhelm Schabel

169 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Wilhelm Schabel
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Automotive Engineering 1.5k
  • Polymers and Plastics 885
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 3.4k
  • Computational Mechanics 517
  • Mechanical Engineering 866
Replace Philip Scharfer with:
Philip Scharfer Germany
Fuqiang Liu China
Mark D. Pritzker Canada
Ying Yang China
Félix N. Büchi Switzerland
He Huang China
Brant Anthony Peppley Canada
Weiwei Yang China
Ulrike Krewer Germany
Jan Robert Selman United States
Wilhelm Schabel relative to Philip Scharfer Germany Philip Scharfer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Philip Scharfer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wilhelm Schabel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wilhelm Schabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wilhelm Schabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wilhelm Schabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wilhelm Schabel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wilhelm Schabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wilhelm Schabel. The network helps show where Wilhelm Schabel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wilhelm Schabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wilhelm Schabel Line = papers co-authored together Wilhelm Schabel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 175 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016288
2 2016172
3 2009167
4 2015166
5 2014163
6 2019161
7 2011156
8 2017151
9 2015142
10 2012118
11 2013116
12 201191
13 200985
14 200982
15 201276
16 201774
17 201773
18 201168
19 201166
20 200964

About Wilhelm Schabel

Wilhelm Schabel is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Mechanical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 175 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Battery Materials (44 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (43 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (25 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (19 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (16 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (14 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (14 papers) and Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (1.5k citations), Polymers and Plastics (885 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.4k citations), Computational Mechanics (517 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (866 citations). Wilhelm Schabel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Philip Scharfer, Michael Baunach, Stefan Jaiser, Matthias Kind, Marcus Müller, Marcel Schmitt, Werner Bauer, Jana Kumberg, Alexander Colsmann and Uli Lemmer. Their work appears in journals such as Energy Technology, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Drying Technology and The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact