W.‐H. Steeb

2.3k citations
183 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

W.‐H. Steeb

165 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

W.‐H. Steeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.1k
  • Numerical Analysis 210
  • Geometry and Topology 213
  • Modeling and Simulation 105
  • Mathematical Physics 119
Replace Kenneth R. Meyer with:
Kenneth R. Meyer United States
S. P. Hastings United States
Rafael D. Benguria Chile
A. Roy Chowdhury India
Carmen Chicone United States
Jan A. Sanders Netherlands
James Murdock United States
В. В. Козлов Russia
W. K. Schief Australia
V. K. Mel’nikov Russia
W.‐H. Steeb relative to Kenneth R. Meyer United States Kenneth R. Meyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Kenneth R. Meyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.‐H. Steeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.‐H. Steeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.‐H. Steeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.‐H. Steeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.‐H. Steeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.‐H. Steeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.‐H. Steeb. The network helps show where W.‐H. Steeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.‐H. Steeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.‐H. Steeb Line = papers co-authored together W.‐H. Steeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991162
2 1988103
3 1995102
4 198057
5
Chaos and quantum chaos
198654
6 199153
7 198439
8 199136
9 198332
10 199232
11 199731
12
Kronecker product of matrices and applications
199130
13 199928
14 198224
15 198523
16 198223
17 198521
18 198321
19 198920
20 198518

About W.‐H. Steeb

W.‐H. Steeb is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Numerical Analysis, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geometry and Topology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 183 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (66 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (65 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (36 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (27 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (26 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (18 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (16 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.1k citations), Numerical Analysis (210 citations), Geometry and Topology (213 citations), Modeling and Simulation (105 citations) and Mathematical Physics (119 citations). W.‐H. Steeb has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, South Africa and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include K. Kowalski, Norbert Euler, P. Mulser, Tomasz Kapitaniak, D. Bauer, Walter Oevel, Yorick Hardy, R. Stoop, Walter Strampp and W. D. Heiss. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, International Journal of Modern Physics C, Progress of Theoretical Physics, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan and physica status solidi (b).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact