W.H. Melbourne

2.4k citations
54 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

W.H. Melbourne

51 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

W.H. Melbourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Environmental Engineering 1.2k
  • Computational Mechanics 984
  • Aerospace Engineering 852
  • Earth-Surface Processes 97
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 253
Replace B.J. Vickery with:
B.J. Vickery Canada
Henry W. Tieleman United States
CW Letchford United States
Partha P. Sarkar United States
Mingshui Li China
Spyros G. Voutsinas Greece
Kapil Chauhan Australia
Neil Kelley United States
Wenjuan Lou China
Bogusz Bienkiewicz United States
W.H. Melbourne relative to B.J. Vickery Canada B.J. Vickery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
B.J. Vickery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.H. Melbourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.H. Melbourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.H. Melbourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.H. Melbourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.H. Melbourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.H. Melbourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.H. Melbourne. The network helps show where W.H. Melbourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside W.H. Melbourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.H. Melbourne Line = papers co-authored together W.H. Melbourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006184
2 1978151
3 1997123
4 198188
5 198981
6 198377
7 199576
8 199676
9 199970
10 199260
11 198651
12 198541
13 199741
14 198737
15 199235
16 199935
17
The effect of turbulence intensity on stall of the NACA 0021 aerofoil
200133
18 198733
19 200531
20 200329

About W.H. Melbourne

W.H. Melbourne is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (41 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (22 papers), Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research (15 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (14 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (9 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (5 papers), Vibration and Dynamic Analysis (5 papers) and Aeolian processes and effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (1.2k citations), Computational Mechanics (984 citations), Aerospace Engineering (852 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (97 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (253 citations). W.H. Melbourne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include P. Saathoff, Q.S. Li, K.C.S. Kwok, H. M. Blackburn, Benjamin Loxton, Simon Watkins, John Sheridan, T. P. Yunck, J.D. Holmes and Robert N. Meroney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Wind and Structures, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Journal of Structural Engineering and Engineering Structures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact