Werner Bohleber
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
Papers in
-
- Psychoanalysis and Social Critique 33
-
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy 19
- Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration 5
- Co-authors
- Dominique Scarfone (4 shared papers)Juan Pablo Jiménez (5 shared papers)Sverre Varvin (4 shared papers)Marianne Leuzinger‐Bohleber (2 shared papers)Peter Fonagy (2 shared papers)Hartmut Radebold (1 shared paper)Jürgen Zinnecker (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Werner Bohleber
56 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- General Psychology 48
- Cultural Studies 104
- Clinical Psychology 241
- Social Psychology 103
- Philosophy 54
Countries citing papers authored by Werner Bohleber
This map shows the geographic impact of Werner Bohleber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Werner Bohleber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Werner Bohleber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Werner Bohleber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Werner Bohleber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Werner Bohleber. The network helps show where Werner Bohleber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Werner Bohleber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 5 | Die Gegenwart der Psychoanalyse - die Psychoanalyse der Gegenwart | 2002 | 20 |
| 6 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 8 | Transgenerationale Weitergabe kriegsbelasteter Kindheiten : interdisziplinäre Studien zur Nachhaltigkeit historischer Erfahrungen über vier Generationen | 2008 | 11 |
| 9 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 5 |
About Werner Bohleber
Werner Bohleber is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (33 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (19 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Memory, History, Trauma, Identity (10 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (9 papers), German History and Society (7 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (6 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (48 citations), Cultural Studies (104 citations), Clinical Psychology (241 citations), Social Psychology (103 citations) and Philosophy (54 citations). Werner Bohleber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Chile and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Scarfone, Juan Pablo Jiménez, Sverre Varvin, Marianne Leuzinger‐Bohleber, Peter Fonagy, Hartmut Radebold and Jürgen Zinnecker. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, PSYCHE, American imago, Psychoanalytic Dialogues and Psychoanalytic Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.