Wei Jin

90 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Wei Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Bioengineering 480
  • Ceramics and Composites 194
  • Materials Chemistry 883
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 944
  • Structural Biology 21
Replace Young‐Gui Yoon with:
Young‐Gui Yoon South Korea
M. Gajdardziska‐Josifovska United States
S.K. Kulkarni India
I. Sildos Estonia
Mitsuhiro Saito Japan
Gen Katagiri Japan
Ralf Brüning Canada
Irene Suarez‐Martinez Australia
Roy H. Geiss United States
D.J. Williams United States
Wei Jin relative to Young‐Gui Yoon South Korea Young‐Gui Yoon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Young‐Gui Yoon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei Jin. The network helps show where Wei Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei Jin Line = papers co-authored together Wei Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015107
2 2015104
3 199499
4 199387
5 201784
6 201575
7 199367
8 199255
9 201551
10 202447
11 201546
12 201241
13 201437
14 198836
15 201536
16 201135
17 201734
18 201733
19 199133
20 201632

About Wei Jin

Wei Jin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (23 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (21 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (15 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (15 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (12 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (9 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers) and Graphene research and applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (480 citations), Ceramics and Composites (194 citations), Materials Chemistry (883 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (944 citations) and Structural Biology (21 citations). Wei Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xinhui Jiang, Priya Vashishta, Rajiv K. Kalia, T.T. Wang, José Pedro Rino, Jing Luo, Georgios Lefkidis, Wolfgang Hübner, Chun Li and S.Y. Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Materials Letters, Physical review. B., Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact