Wayne Waxman
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 4
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 2
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 1
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 1
- Journals
- Kantian Review (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Mind (1 paper)Hume studies (3 papers)The review of metaphysics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Wayne Waxman
15 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Philosophy 161
- History and Philosophy of Science 68
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- Political Science and International Relations 47
- General Social Sciences 5
Countries citing papers authored by Wayne Waxman
This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne Waxman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne Waxman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne Waxman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne Waxman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne Waxman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne Waxman. The network helps show where Wayne Waxman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Wayne Waxman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 73 | |
| 2 | Kant's Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism | 1991 | 43 |
| 3 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | Kant on the Possibility of Thought: Universals without Language | 1995 | 3 |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 0 |
About Wayne Waxman
Wayne Waxman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and General Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (161 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (68 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), Political Science and International Relations (47 citations) and General Social Sciences (5 citations). Wayne Waxman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. A. J. Rogers and Vere Chappell. Their work appears in journals such as Kantian Review, The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind, Hume studies and The review of metaphysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.